equivalent to
              

or click here for 32 off-suit



basics
connectors yes (14.48%)
suited yes (23.53%)
combinations 4 (0.30%)
odds 1 : 331
nicknames
full analysis



ranking
sklansky group group 8 of 8, top 57-64 hand info
carnegie mellon group group 7 of 7, top 43-49 hand info
hellmuth group not ranked info
lederer group not ranked
meinert group not ranked
chen point score 2 (3) + 2 (flush) + 1 (straight) = 5 info
hutchinson score 3 (3) + 2 (2) + 3 (gap 1) + 4 (suited) + position = 12 + 0/3/5 info



equity against a known hand
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 T J Q K A
2 % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2
3s   % % % % % % % % % % % % 3
4s     % % % % % % % % % % % 4
5s       % % % % % % % % % % 5
6s         % % % % % % % % % 6
7s           % % % % % % % % 7
8s             % % % % % % % 8
9s               % % % % % % 9
Ts                 % % % % % T
Js                   % % % % J
Qs                     % % % Q
Ks                       % % K
As                         % A
2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s Ts Js Qs Ks A
full analysis



equity against random hands
opponents 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
win 32.3% 20.0% 14.2% 11.0% 9.1% 7.8% 6.9% 6.2% 5.7%
relative
break-even 50.0% 33.3% 25.0% 20.0% 16.7% 14.3% 12.5% 11.1% 10.0%
full analysis



real-world equity in big bets by position
position SB BB 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 players tightpoker -0.17 -0.33 -0.13 -0.08 -0.10 -0.07 -0.09 -0.06 -0.09 -0.09
10 players pokerroom -0.17 -0.33 -0.14 -0.08 -0.10 -0.08 -0.09 -0.07 -0.08 -0.10
9 players pokerroom -0.20 -0.29 -0.15 -0.10 -0.12 -0.16 -0.11 -0.07 -0.08
8 players pokerroom -0.32 -0.26 -0.18 -0.13 -0.12 -0.10 -0.09 -0.08
7 players pokerroom -0.20 -0.33 -0.08 -0.08 -0.12 -0.10 -0.13
6 players pokerroom -0.31 -0.36 -0.15 -0.08 -0.06 -0.01
5 players pokerroom -0.25 -0.30 -0.14 -0.08 -0.12
4 players pokerroom -0.24 -0.29 -0.12 -0.08
3 players pokerroom -0.20 -0.24 -0.06
2 players pokerroom -0.21 -0.12
data provided by tightpoker.com and pokerroom.com



hand type on the flop
percentage odds
royal flush impossible impossible
straight flush 0.01% 1 : 9799
four of a kind 0.01% 1 : 9799
full house 0.09% 1 : 1088
flush 0.83% 1 : 119
straight 0.64% 1 : 155
three of a kind 1.57% 1 : 62.6
two pair 4.04% 1 : 23.7
one pair 40.41% 1 : 1.47
high card 52.39% 1.10 : 1
full analysis



action recommended at full table
early position middle position late position
no one called fold fold fold
limpers only fold fold fold
a raise only fold fold fold
a raise with 2+ callers fold fold
from king yao's "weighing the odds in hold'em poker"



at least one opponent is having an overcard at different table sizes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ace 15.51% 29.14% 41.05% 51.40% 60.32% 67.95% 74.42% 79.86% 84.39%
A or K 29.71% 51.40% 66.99% 78.02% 85.68% 90.89% 94.36% 96.62% 98.04%
A, K or Q 42.61% 67.95% 82.63% 90.89% 95.40% 97.77% 98.97% 99.55% 99.81%
A, K, Q or J 54.20% 79.86% 91.54% 96.62% 98.72% 99.55% 99.85% 99.96% 99.99%
T or better 64.49% 88.10% 96.26% 98.91% 99.71% 99.93% 99.98% 100.00% 100.00%
9 or better 73.47% 93.51% 98.55% 99.71% 99.95% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
8 or better 81.14% 96.82% 99.53% 99.94% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
7 or better 87.51% 98.67% 99.88% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
6 or better 92.57% 99.57% 99.98% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
5 or better 96.33% 99.91% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
4 or better 98.78% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
full analysis



community cards contain overcards
flop turn river
Ace 22.55% 29.14% 35.30%
A or K 41.43% 51.40% 59.85%
A, K or Q 56.96% 67.95% 76.31%
A, K, Q or J 69.47% 79.86% 86.87%
T or better 79.29% 88.10% 93.27%
9 or better 86.73% 93.51% 96.90%
8 or better 92.14% 96.82% 98.76%
7 or better 95.84% 98.67% 99.60%
6 or better 98.14% 99.57% 99.91%
5 or better 99.39% 99.91% 99.99%
4 or better 99.90% 99.99% 100.00%
full analysis



equity if kicker decides against several opponents
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
3 1.22% 0.01% 0.00% impossible impossible impossible impossible impossible impossible
2 0.08% impossible impossible impossible impossible impossible impossible impossible impossible
full analysis