equivalent to
                        




basics
pocket pair yes (5.88%)
suited no (76.47%)
combinations 6 (0.45%)
odds 1 : 220
nicknames Sailboats, Luke Skywalker
full analysis



ranking
sklansky group group 7 of 8, top 49-56 hand info
carnegie mellon group group 6 of 7, top 36-42 hand info
hellmuth group not ranked info
lederer group group E of E, top 21-25 hand
meinert group group 8 of 8, top 57-64 hand
chen point score 5 (low pair, 2*5 < 5) = 10 info
hutchinson score 4 (4) + 4 (4) + 10 (gap 0) + position = 18 + 0/3/5 info



equity against a known hand
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 T J Q K A
2 % % % % % % % % % % % % % 2
3s   % % % % % % % % % % % % 3
4s     % % % % % % % % % % % 4
5s       % % % % % % % % % % 5
6s         % % % % % % % % % 6
7s           % % % % % % % % 7
8s             % % % % % % % 8
9s               % % % % % % 9
Ts                 % % % % % T
Js                   % % % % J
Qs                     % % % Q
Ks                       % % K
As                         % A
2s 3s 4s 5s 6s 7s 8s 9s Ts Js Qs Ks A
full analysis



equity against random hands
opponents 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
win 57.0% 36.9% 26.4% 20.7% 17.4% 15.3% 13.9% 13.0% 12.2%
relative
break-even 50.0% 33.3% 25.0% 20.0% 16.7% 14.3% 12.5% 11.1% 10.0%
full analysis



real-world equity in big bets by position
position SB BB 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10 players tightpoker +0.05 -0.10 -0.09 -0.06 -0.01 +0.11 +0.02 +0.02 -0.06 -0.04
10 players pokerroom +0.05 -0.10 -0.08 -0.06 -0.01 +0.10 +0.02 +0.02 -0.06 -0.03
9 players pokerroom -0.04 -0.20 -0.01 -0.08 -0.07 -0.03 -0.00 +0.04 -0.08
8 players pokerroom -0.09 -0.08 -0.10 -0.14 -0.12 -0.04 -0.01 -0.05
7 players pokerroom -0.09 -0.14 -0.17 -0.01 -0.12 +0.12 -0.02
6 players pokerroom -0.09 -0.13 +0.16 -0.09 +0.27 +0.03
5 players pokerroom -0.12 -0.09 -0.03 0.00 +0.07
4 players pokerroom -0.08 -0.10 +0.06 +0.04
3 players pokerroom -0.06 -0.01 +0.13
2 players pokerroom +0.04 +0.07
data provided by tightpoker.com and pokerroom.com



hand type on the flop
percentage odds
royal flush impossible impossible
straight flush impossible impossible
four of a kind 0.24% 1 : 407
full house 0.98% 1 : 101
flush impossible impossible
straight impossible impossible
three of a kind 10.78% 1 : 8.28
two pair 16.16% 1 : 5.19
one pair 71.84% 2.55 : 1
high card impossible impossible
full analysis



action recommended at full table
early position middle position late position
no one called fold fold raise
limpers only call call raise; call
a raise only fold fold fold; reraise
a raise with 2+ callers fold call with two or more limpers; fold
from king yao's "weighing the odds in hold'em poker"



at least one opponent is having an overcard at different table sizes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ace 15.51% 29.14% 41.05% 51.40% 60.32% 67.95% 74.42% 79.86% 84.39%
A or K 29.71% 51.40% 66.99% 78.02% 85.68% 90.89% 94.36% 96.62% 98.04%
A, K or Q 42.61% 67.95% 82.63% 90.89% 95.40% 97.77% 98.97% 99.55% 99.81%
A, K, Q or J 54.20% 79.86% 91.54% 96.62% 98.72% 99.55% 99.85% 99.96% 99.99%
T or better 64.49% 88.10% 96.26% 98.91% 99.71% 99.93% 99.98% 100.00% 100.00%
9 or better 73.47% 93.51% 98.55% 99.71% 99.95% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
8 or better 81.14% 96.82% 99.53% 99.94% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
7 or better 87.51% 98.67% 99.88% 99.99% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
6 or better 92.57% 99.57% 99.98% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
5 or better 96.33% 99.91% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
full analysis



community cards contain overcards
flop turn river
Ace 22.55% 29.14% 35.30%
A or K 41.43% 51.40% 59.85%
A, K or Q 56.96% 67.95% 76.31%
A, K, Q or J 69.47% 79.86% 86.87%
T or better 79.29% 88.10% 93.27%
9 or better 86.73% 93.51% 96.90%
8 or better 92.14% 96.82% 98.76%
7 or better 95.84% 98.67% 99.60%
6 or better 98.14% 99.57% 99.91%
5 or better 99.39% 99.91% 99.99%
full analysis



equity if kicker decides against several opponents
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4 3.67% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% impossible impossible impossible impossible
4 3.67% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% impossible impossible impossible impossible
full analysis